Presentation Week 11: Kertesz and Cartier-Bresson versus Smith and
Salgado
Henri Cartier
is known as the father of modern photojournalism and considered a master of
candid photography. Cartier-Bresson famously captured pivotal moments of the
20th. He was a French photographer who was an early adopter of 35 mm
format, and the master of candid photography. He helped develop the
"street photography" or "real life reportage" style that
has influenced many generations of photographers who followed and this is one
of his photographs.
'We photographers
deal in things which are continually vanishing, and when they have vanished
there is no contrivance on earth can make them come back again. We cannot
develop and print a memory.'-Henri Cartier
André Kertész is one of the
most renowned photographers of the 20th century; he was a quiet but
important influence on the coming of age of photojournalism and the art of
photography. He also discovered and demonstrated
the special aesthetic of the small camera.
Andre Kertesz
- Broken Plate - 1929. PORTLAND, MAINE.
Eugene Smith was perhaps the
photographer who tried most heroically to make the magazine photo story meet
the standards of coherence, intensity, and personal accountability that one expects
of a work of art. He was an
unquestioned leader of the photo story experiment. Smith was fanatically dedicated to
his mission as a photographer so he was a figure universally admired as an
artist.
W. Eugene
Smith took this picture of a wounded soldier in Okinawa in 1945.
Sebastião Salgado is a Brazilian photographer and he
is one of the most respected photojournalists working today. He has dedicated
himself to chronicling the lives of the world’s dispossessed.
Sebastião
Salgado
Gourma-Rharous
Mali, 1985
Gourma-Rharous
Mali, 1985
1.What are
the main differences and similarities?
All of them are capturing the
truth in their eyes and sending the viewers their own message. The difference
between the two different types of photographers is that Andre Kertesz and
Henri Cartier are both “invisible” while taking photos, they both try to stay
low while they’re shooting, that way their presence will not influence what
they were photographing. They also believed that to capture the right photo you
had to use your intuition and that everything had its right moment. Whereas
Eugene Smith and Sebastiao Salgado are “visible”. They alert their shooting
subject and developing a close relation with them. They believe that you must
be a visible photographer and that the best photos came from interacting with
your subjects. We can also define them as one side is shooting a truth image
and the other side as fake image or far from truth image. So the visibility of
these photographers is one of the differences but they both still capture real
life scenes of people , places, events or subjects.
2.What has been the impact of
digital photography on journalism?
Every photographer has his or her own different
techniques of shooting the truth. journalism is a way to report and talk about
events, issues and trends to a audience I would think the better journalism
approach in this scenario would be as the photographer the pictures they take
have a difference between objects and still life from a photographers point of
view, how they emphasize and portray their photos to the viewer.
By Natasha Koo
Danielle Hall
Nicole